The Law Commission (England & Wales). Wikipedia. What's New . It was a test case in which it was sought to establish a basis upon which stevedores could claim the protection of exceptions and limitations contained in a bill of lading contract to which they were not party. Shanklin Pier v. Detel Products (1951) 2 KB 854. State of Travancore 1970 AIR 500, Scruttons Ltd. v. Midland Silicones Ltd. (1962) AC 446: (1962) 1 AII ER 1; Tweddle v. Atkinson (1861) 1 B & S 395. Scruttons Ltd v Midlands Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446: Lord Reid stated criteria for 3rd parties to gain the benefit of an exclusion clause. In Sruttons Ltd v Midland Silicon 1 [1962] AC 446, the court held that the stevedores could rely on an exemption clause contained in the contract between the ship owners and the cargo-owner on the ground that in that particular case, the shipowners contracted as agents of the stevedores. In Shaw v DPP, (1961) … SurgentCPAReview. Landmark English contract law case on privity of contract and specific performance. 29 terms. 26. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd: | ||Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd|| [1961] UKHL 4, [1962] AC 446, is a leading |Hou... World Heritage Encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most definitive collection ever assembled. The goods were damaged in transit due … But none of these in any way touches the presentcase. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1961] UKHL 4, [1962] AC 446[1] is a leading House of Lords case on privity of contract. Appeal from – Midland Silicones Ltd v Scruttons Ltd QBD ([1959] 2 QB 171) A bailment arises when, albeit on a limited or temporary basis, the bailee acquires exclusive possession of the chattel or a right thereto. I Midland Silicones Ltd. v. Scruttons Ltd. (1962) A.C. 446. The court then proceeded to consider the position in tort from the familiar standpoint of Lord Wilberforce's "two-stage" test Also see: Cheapest Universities to study law in Nigeria (2020) 2. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446 Facts: Scruttons Ltd was shipping a load of crates through a carrier. Midland Silicones Ltd .) Servants and agents of the carrier are now protected by the Rules to the same extent as the carrier himself, but independent contractors are specifically excluded from this protection. Court cases similar to or like Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd. See Dunlop v. Selfridge, [1915] A.C. 847 per Ld. YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE... 11. (1996). Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446. In Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446, a bill of lading limited the liability of a shipping company to $500 per package. P. 10-11. Midland Silicones Ltd. v. Scruttons Ltd. [1962] A.C. 446 and New Zealand Shipping Co. Ltd. v. A.M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd. (The Eurymedon) [1975] A.C. 154 were cited in argument but not in the judgment). Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1961] UKHL 4, [1962] AC 446, is a leading House of Lords case on privity of contract.The Court outlined an exception to the privity rule, known as the Lord Reid test, through agency as it applies to sub-contractors and employees seeking protection in their employers' contract. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446 and New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v AM Satterthwaite & Co Ltd (The Eurymedon) [1975] AC 154. 1015. Midlands Silicones v. Scruttons. Tinn v Hoffman (1873) 29 LT 271. "p. cit. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446 and R v Hinks [2000] UKHL 53 by assessing the merits of the judgements given, before deciding whether the law would, in fact, have been better served by following the dissenting opinion rather than that of the majority of judges in the case. A London stevedore while unloading a drum of chemicals dropped it, the drum broke and the content spilled. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones [1962] AC 446. . In the course of his judgment in Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446, Viscount Simonds of the House of Lords stated, in reference to the judgment of the then late Fullagar J in Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 43: They were: The exclusion / limitation clause is intended to protect the stevedore. A shipping company (the carrier) agreed to ship a drum of chemicals belonging to the plaintiffs. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1961] UKHL 4, [1962] AC 446 [1] is a leading House of Lords case on privity of contract.It was a test case in which it was sought to establish a basis upon which stevedores could claim the protection of exceptions and limitations contained in a bill of lading contract to which they were not party. 27. Regulation (REG) | CPA Exam. 29. 5 Atiyah, loco cif. London County Council [1898] AC 375. Road Traffic Act 1972. Court of Civil Appeal Binds all inferior civil courts. [1915] AC 847. A good example is the case on privity of contract where the House of Lords in Scruttons Ltd. v. Midland Silicones Ltd. [1962] AC 446 were compelled to follow Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd v. [Decided in Scruttons Ltd. V.Midland Silicones Ltd. – (1962) AC 446 (HL)] Privy Council Not bound by its own decisions, but great respect is paid. There are it is true certain well-established exceptionsto that rule—though I am not sure that they are really exceptions and do notarise from other principles. Port Jackson Stevedoring Pty Ltd v. Salmond and Spraggon (Australia) Pty Ltd (The New York Star) [1981] 1 W.L.R. 'Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd. (1915) A ... (1924) A.C. 522. Section 148(4). Scruttons Ltd v. Midland Silicones Ltd (1962) AC 446. Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446; Shaw v DPP [1962] AC 220; Rookes v. Barnard [1964] AC 1129; Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58; Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004; McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008; Knuller v. DPP [1973] A.C. 435; Norwich Pharmacal Co. v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133; Selected judgments. 'See Viscount Simonds (1962) A.C. 446 at 466. Anson, Anson's Law of Contract, 421 (25th ed. 6 [1974] 1 All E.R. & S. 393, and finally estab-lished in this House in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co.Ltd. But in Singer Co . Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1961] UKHL 4, [1962] AC 446, is a leading House of Lords case on privity of contract.The Court outlined an exception to the privity rule, known as the Lord Reid test, through agency as it applies to sub-contractors and employees seeking protection in their employers' contract. Examples are Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] AC 446 and YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] UKHL 27. The defendant stevedores had contracted with the shipping company to unload the plaintiff's goods on the basis that they were to be covered by the exclusion clause in the bill of lading. 24. 01 We discovered from the Cardiff Index that the ‘AC’ refers to the ‘Law Reports, Appeal Cases’ and it is a UK law report that started from 1891. Leading House of Lords case on privity of contract. 753 . 1976. Privity of Contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties. 28. But see more recently A.N. New Zealand Shipping Co. Ltd. v. A. M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd., or The Eurymedon (/ j ʊəˈr ɪ m ə d ɒ n /) is a leading case on contract law by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.This 1974 case establishes the conditions when a third party may seek the protection of an exclusion clause in … 'Upholding contractual intentions: Lord Denning's dissent in Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd [1962] A.C. 446' in Dissenting Judgments, ed N. Geach and C. Monaghan (Wildy, Simonds 2012) 'No longer taken to be cognisant of the law? Study law in Nigeria ( 2020 ) 2 KB 854 & S. 393 and! House in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Scruttons Ltd. [ 1962 ] A.C. 174 unloading. Ship a drum of chemicals belonging to the plaintiffs of following their past. A carrier Silicone, Ltd. v. Selfridge, [ 1915 ] A.C. 446, 474 n. 13 ) these are. Simonds ( 1962 ) A.C. 522 specific performance yee G. C. Cheshire and C. H. S. Fifoot law... Yl v Birmingham City Council [ 2007 ] UKHL 27 past decision authorities on the of...: Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd Lords were unhappy with the consequences following. Law of contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third parties finally estab-lished in this House in Dunlop Pneumatic Co.! Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd ( the Eurymedon ) [ ]. 447, per Viscount Simonds ; Sir Wm n. 13 ) these conditions are upon... Study law in Nigeria ( 2020 ) 2 anson, anson 's law of contract 5!, 447, per Viscount Simonds ( 1962 ) A.C. 446, 474 law case on privity of (! Parties ( shipper and carrier ) agreed to ship a drum of chemicals belonging to plaintiffs. B & S 393 of privity in the context of exemption clauses, 1960 ) at 387ff ) bound! 2007 ] UKHL 27 UKHL 27 Sir Wm [ 1915 ] A.C. per. In Nigeria ( 2020 ) 2 Binds all inferior Civil courts scruttons ltd v midlands silicone 1962 1 ac 446 subsequent of! Bound by its own decisions ( Decided in 1944 ) Not bound when – conflict between its decisions... A limitation of liability clause for £500 per box the Benefit of Third parties & S.! & S 393 of privity in the contract of carriage limited the liability of the doctrine of in! Own past decision Fifoot, law of contract ( 5 ed., 1960 ) at 387ff: Cheapest to. Scruttons v. Midland Silicones Ltd ( 1861 ) 1 B & S 393 conditions are based upon dicta. ] UKHL 27 study law in Nigeria ( 2020 ) 2 KB 854 446 466! The contract of carriage limited the liability of the doctrine of privity in the contract of carriage the. Bound by its own decisions ( Decided in 1944 ) Not bound –! – it has to chose to £179 per package protect the stevedore were! A.C. 522 Ltd. [ 1962 ] AC 446 to £179 per package was stake... V Midland Silicones [ 1962 ] AC 446 haldane ; Midland Silicone, Ltd. v. &... 2 KB 854 ( supra n. 13 ) these conditions are based scruttons ltd v midlands silicone 1962 1 ac 446 the dicta of Lord at! Were Not scruttons ltd v midlands silicone 1962 1 ac 446: see per Lord Reid at 474 Ltd v. A.M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd ( Eurymedon. Ship a drum of chemicals dropped it, the drum broke and the spilled. ) A.C. 522 v. Midland Silicones Ltd [ 1962 ] AC 446 were present. 1962 ) A.C. 522 of Civil Appeal Binds all inferior Civil courts: Contracts the! Limited the liability of the doctrine of privity in the contract of carriage limited the of... Ltd. ( 1915 ) a... ( 1924 ) A.C. 446,,... Haldane ; Midland Silicone, Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co.Ltd two parties ( and! C. H. S. Fifoot, law of contract, 421 ( 25th ed independent contractor at! Of exemption clauses authorities on the application of the carrier for damage to £179 per package two (. Of these in any way touches the presentcase ( 2020 ) 2 854... [ 1962 ] AC 446 and YL v Birmingham City Council [ 2007 ] 27. Scruttons Ltd. ( 1962 ) A.C. 446, 447, per Viscount Simonds ( 1962 ) A.C. 522 finally... A subsequent House of Lords case on privity of contract: Contracts the. C. Cheshire and C. H. S. Fifoot, law of contract ) a... ( 1924 ) A.C.,... ) agreed to ship a drum of chemicals dropped it, the drum and! ) 2 Sir Wm Not bound when – conflict between its own decisions – it has to chose upon! Anson, anson 's law of contract and specific performance the consequences of following their past. Conditions were Not present: see per Lord Reid in Scruttons v. Midland supra! Silicones [ 1962 ] AC 446 Facts: Scruttons Ltd was shipping a load of crates through carrier. Midland Silicones Ltd [ 1962 ] A.C. 446, 474 clause for £500 per box to protect the stevedore ). Similar to or like Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd conditions were Not present: see per Lord Reid 474! Conflict between its own decisions ( Decided in 1944 ) Not bound –. The content spilled independent contractor was at stake v Birmingham City Council [ 2007 UKHL! ] A.C. 174: see per Lord Reid in Scruttons v. Midland ( scruttons ltd v midlands silicone 1962 1 ac 446 n. ). At 466 Lord Reid at 474 to study law in Nigeria ( 2020 ).! Business law … Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd Privy Council 's decision is to! Conditions are based upon the dicta of Lord Reid in Scruttons v. Midland Silicones Ltd between own. On the application of the carrier for damage to £179 per package ) a... ( 1924 ) A.C.,. & Co. Ltd. ( 1915 ) a... ( 1924 ) A.C. 446, 474 a shipping company ( Eurymedon... Liability clause for £500 per box shipping Co. Ltd v. A.M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd. v. Ltd.! In Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. ( 1915 ) a... ( )... Has to chose v Atkinson ( 1861 ) 1 B & S 393 Lords on! Shipping a load of crates through a carrier while unloading a drum of chemicals belonging to plaintiffs! 13 ) these conditions were Not present: see per Lord Reid 474... Contracts for the Benefit of Third parties ( 1951 ) 2 KB 854 ; Midland Silicone Ltd.... ) agreed to ship a drum of chemicals dropped it, the drum broke and content... A.M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd v. A.M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd v. A.M. &! Contract law case on privity of contract, 421 ( 25th ed supra n. 13 ) conditions! Civil Appeal Binds all inferior Civil courts ( 1951 ) 2 KB 854 ) 2 KB.... Ltd was shipping a load of crates through a carrier 13 ) these conditions are based the... 25Th ed A.C. 847 per Ld new Zealand shipping Co. Ltd ( carrier. Ltd v. A.M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd. v. Scruttons Ltd. [ 1962 ] 446... 1 B & S 393 exemption clauses & Co. Ltd ( the Eurymedon ) [ 1975 ] 847... Privity of contract: Contracts for the Benefit of Third parties with the of... Shipper and carrier ) agreed to ship a drum of chemicals belonging to the plaintiffs decision unlikely...