Specifically, static risk factors refer to variables that are usually not amenable to change over time, for instance, history of violence. A total of 156 parole and probation officers completed repeated three-level (static, stable, and acute) risk assessments on 997 sexual offenders across 16 jurisdictions. To reduce reoffending, we need to help people manage or overcome risk factors and develop or strengthen protective factors. For example, poor temper control or an anti-social peer group. The more intensive programmes specify an OVP score of 60% or above. 16 FEDERAL PROBATION Volume 80 Number 2 RISK FACTORS HAVE 1 2 Enhancing Community Supervision Through the Application of Dynamic Risk Assessment commonly been distinguished as being either static (e.g., age at first arrest, number of prior convictions) or dynamic (e.g., substance use, employment status). Introduction. Thorough information gathering should be followed by analysis to identify harm and risk factors. Second, what can be done to decrease this likelihood? Don’t worry we won’t send you spam or share your email address with anyone. You can change your cookie settings at any time. The first step in identifying people who pose a serious harm is to establish the specific risk factors which apply to those individuals. Dynamic factors are associated with the changing likelihood of reoffending over time. Accredited offending behaviour programmes often require particular OGRS scores as part of their eligibility criteria. In HMPPS these are predictor tools such as the Offender Group Reconviction Sore (OGRS) or the Risk of Serious Recidivism (RSR). These include age, gender, current offence type or childhood experiences. The offender has the potential to cause such harm. There are further tools for particular contexts. For example, failure to take medication, loss of accommodation, relationship breakdown, drug or alcohol misuse, High: there are identifiable indicators of serious harm. • Static factors, based on … The Offender Assessment System (OASys) was introduced in 2001 and built on the existing ‘What Works’ evidence base. Current Age 24 years or older 0 59 or more years of age -2 20-23 years 1 40-58 years of age -1 19 years or younger 2 33 – 39 years of age 0 2. Static Risk Factors – do not change Dynamic Risk Factors (criminogenic needs) – changeable, targets for services & intervention An OGRS3 score of 50% or more means that an offender is more likely than not to commit a proven re-offence within 2 years. Although perfect prediction is an unattainable goal, the serious consequences of incorrect risk decisions justify careful attention to the most appropriate methods of risk assessment. Considerable effort has been made over the years to develop reliable, unbiased estimates of the risk of further offending. We should avoid directing limited resources to those unlikely to reoffend. It is important to identify the person or groups of people who are specifically at risk. & Adult) 8. For sentence planning or risk management, we need a further assessment using dynamic information to identify: Clinical predictions of the likelihood of reoffending are less objective and less accurate. The potential event is more likely than not to happen as soon as the opportunity arises and the impact would be serious. Percentage likelihood of committing a seriously harmful reoffence within two years. OASys defines serious harm as ‘an event which is life threatening and/or traumatic and from which recovery, whether physical or psychological, can be expected to be difficult or impossible’. Assessment of static and dynamic factors to determine pre- and post-treatment (accredited programme) needs. Static risk factors – do not change Dynamic risk factors (similar to criminogenic needs) – changeable, targets for services & intervention. Developed in the 1980s and first formalized in 1990, the risk-need-responsivity model has been used with increasing success to assess and rehabilitate criminals in Canada and around the world. People who reoffend most often have risk factors across many areas. We will go over the two common instruments used to evaluate violence risk in adults and in juveniles later in the article. A structured professional judgement assessment based on completion of OASys. It is most often used with registerable sex offense pursuant to Penal Code § 290. An actuarial tool using only static data, can bring a swift, reliable estimate of the likelihood of reconviction. An individual who is rated as presenting a ‘high’ or ‘very high’ risk of serious harm is managed by the NPS. We can measure likelihood of reoffending in several ways: Actuarial or clinical? It combines the best of actuarial methods of prediction with structured professional judgement to provide standardised assessments of offenders’ risks and needs, helping to link these risks and needs to individualised sentence plans and risk management plans1. We use cookies to collect information about how you use GOV.UK. Prior Prob/Parole Revocation (juv. We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve government services. Differentiating higher risk offenders from lower risk offenders is important for the police, courts, correctional workers, and the general public. Tell us what you think of the Prison and probation evidence resource so we can improve it. Static Risk Factors Pts Dynamic Risk Factors Pts 1. Prison, probation and rehabilitation: Public Protection Manual, The Risk Assessment Tools Evaluation Directory (RATED), Research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System, Public protection manual: PSI 18/2016, PI 17/2016, Offending behaviour programmes and interventions, Multi-agency public protection arrangements (MAPPA), Coronavirus (COVID-19): guidance and support, Transparency and freedom of information releases, likelihood of future re-offending and reconviction - the probability that someone will offend, be arrested, and reconvicted within two years, risk of serious harm - if reconvicted, the probability that the offence will be one of ‘serious harm’, the relative likelihood that an offence will occur, the relative impact or harm of the offence - what exactly might happen, to what or whom, under what circumstances, and why, the public: either generally or a specific group, for example, the elderly, vulnerable adults, women or an ethnic minority group, a known adult, such as a previous victim or partner, children: either specific children or children in general who may be vulnerable to harm of various kinds - this includes violent or sexual behaviour, emotional harm or neglect or because they are in custody, staff: anyone working with the offender, whether from Probation, the Prison Service, police or other agency. This video is for probation agents learning how to identify static and dynamic risk factors in your clients. Dynamic risk factors are the children of risk prediction. Actuarial risk assessment instruments tend to vary widely regarding the precise risk factors that are measured. As suggested by its name, it is based on three principles: 1) the risk principle asserts that criminal behaviour can be reliably predicted and that treatment should focus on the higher risk offenders; 2) the need principle highlights the importanc… Second, a dynamic risk measure (SOTNPS) or a subset of risk factors contained in this measure would also predict sexual recidivism with moderate accuracy and be sensitive to the changes in dynamic risk over time. Do we need to know whether the person is likely to commit any new offence over a particular period? Both clinical and actuarial assessments can draw on static and dynamic elements. The Risk Assessment Tools Evaluation Directory (RATED) provides a summary of the empirical evidence on each assessment tool included in the directory (The Risk Management Authority, Scotland). There is good evidence that when these programmes are delivered to participants with too low or too high a risk they are much less likely to benefit. Different types of risk facto… But they are unlikely to do so unless there is a change in circumstances. Risk factors may be mitigated by protective factors. Risk is categorised as risk to: Risk factors are circumstances or characteristics that make criminal behaviour more likely. Third, a combined static and dynamic risk measure would predict sexual recidivism more accurately than either measure alone. The Offender Group Reconviction Score (Official Document) OGRS3 uses static risk information to estimate the likelihood of re-offending within time periods of one and two years. Some risk assessment tools fall in one or other category – others use elements of both. Criteria for approving risk assessment tools is supported by advice from MoJ’s Correctional Services Accreditation and Advice Panel (CSAAP). Desistance is how people with a previous pattern of offending abstain from crime. For example, evidence-based risk factors in juveniles might be slightly different than risk factors in adults. As shown in Chart 1, most offenders entering post-conviction supervision fall within the two lowest PCRA risk categories: minimum risk (39.93 percent) and basic risk (36.62 percent). literature review on Risk Factors). We’ll send you a link to a feedback form. More information about the basis of OGRS 3 can be found in the guidance document. Very high: there is an imminent risk of serious harm. The Criminal Justice Act 2003 defines serious harm as: ‘death or serious personal injury, whether physical or psychological’. The choice of actuarial or clinical risk assessment and static or dynamic is determined by the context and purpose of the risk assessment and will be included in the design of any risk assessment tools. Much decision making in criminal justice needs to be informed by an assessment of whether someone poses a risk to the public. • Risk is determined by static factors and dynamic factors. Static risk factors are those characteristics that can change and are more or less influenced or controlled by the offender, such as employment, motivation, drug use, and family relations. (years) At this writing, all empirically validated actuarial instruments rely on static factors The focus of this paper is on what role dynamic risk factors should play in the development of explanations of crime. It is important that the risk assessment tools we use are theoretically sound and provide reliable and valid estimates. 1. Yet what exactly is a STATIC-99 report? A sufficiently robust risk tool will demonstrate the following components: Our priority is to reduce reoffending and protect the public. It does not represent Ministry of Justice or Government policy. The core risk and need assessment tools are integrated into OASys. The report is distinguishable from a pre-plea report or probation officers report that is available in most felony cases, the most serious cases being th… An OVP score of 30%+ is the criterion for accredited programmes that address violent offending behaviour. This is defined as an offence where the victim is killed or suffers trauma from which it will be hard or impossible to recover. Age at First Arrest (juvenile or adult) 8. Or do we want to estimate the risk that the potential reoffence might be for a violent crime or for any crime likely to cause serious harm? These include the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA) for risk of partner violence, and the RM2000 assessment of the risk of further sexual offending. Typically, we look at one year or two years following the start of a community sentence or release from prison. Criminal behaviour is influenced by a range of individual, social and environmental factors. Rehabilitative intervention is most effective when it is proportionate to the likelihood of someone’s reoffending. Static factors are used to classify long term risk. immediate reoffense risk (moments - days) while stable dynamic factors (alcoholism, mood disorder) correlate with intermediate term reoffense risk (weeks – months). A risk factor is anything that increases the probability that a person will cause harm or will re-offend. dynamic. To be used on all sexual offenders managed by NOMS. The RoSH assessment identifies whether the risk is to known adults, children, staff and/or the public. This is a dynamic and continual process.Risk identification requires information from a range of sources and is the responsibility of all staff. Risk Matrix 2000S. There are two types of risk factors: static . This page summarises the available evidence base and is informed by independent academic peer review. They were identified to help practitioners assess risk of recidivism and to set treatment targets likely to reduce reoffending (Andrews & Bonta, 2010).This resulted in the development of intervention programs designed to modify the characteristics of individuals and their environments associated with crime. Percentage likelihood of committing any offence within 2 years leading to reconviction (proven reoffending). They both draw on the standardised assessment of the more dynamic features of the person’s life that OASys provides. It produces three scores: (1) Felony Risk Score; £SB©ÀP˜K4¡½8“xè¢EáGK_ègü%SÌò¯û||æ>)YDŸ\÷sÄⵓuÂ"DJB!E¹‚/6Ëéêѹ)­v´äÐÆ^HE‰*C0Þú¤ãõY.–î'K§ÑÀ¶M¤ñyhòH8›„þ{`ÎLjð#Š››Á²Xù[±RÄH×IMڔˆl:áA.ì•Å+ëðȋ¬½Z]ÙHBº‡iGL`&¬}’íùžÉzT‚â(µ•=’y more widely-tested static risk factors (such as previous convictions and age). Enable reassessment A protective factor -something that decreases the Data were collected on 21 static or historical factors, such as age, race, education, marital status, employment status, and prior alcohol or drug abuse and 16 dynamic factors, such as living alone, positive social supports, current alcohol and other drug problems, motivation to change, and assessed emotions, and analyzed the relationship of each factor to probation failure. on probation contributes new information to the discussion of risk factors and successful probation outcomes. Static Risk Assessment. Article Risk and Protective Factors for Probation Success Among Youth Offenders in Singapore Dongdong Li1, Chi Meng Chu1, Xuexin Xu1, Gerald Zeng1, and Kala Ruby2 Abstract The study examined the risk and protective factors for the successful completion of probation ’Opportunity’ can include the removal or overcoming of controls, and changes in circumstances. This is weighted by the strength of their link with future behaviour, based on large scale research evidence. Sex Offender Recidivism Any summary of the findings from existing studies of sex offender recidivism must begin by acknowledging that there is a great deal of variation in the offender populations studied, the size of the sample, the definition of recidivism, the length of the The first is a brief (26 questions) Static Risk Assessment which is comprised entirely of static factors, dealing specifically with prior criminal record. Clinical assessments rely on a practitioner’s judgement and experience to estimate the imminence of the offending behaviour. The risk of harm posed by offenders to others has two key dimensions: Some crimes like shoplifting, have relatively little impact or harm. SARN TNA. It is a continuous and evolving process. Used by police, prisons and probation. All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service. A summary of evidence relating to offender risk assessment, risk of reoffending and risk of serious harm. People are allocated to a Risk of Serious Harm category from ‘low’ to ‘very high’. STATIC-99R is a risk assessment tool provided for at Penal Code § 290.04(b(1). The risk factors can vary depending on the population that is being evaluated. People tend to interpret others’ behaviour as because of the sort of person they are. perspective on the risk assessment tools used by Probation Officers to assess the risk that sex offenders pose. Fewer than 2% of the caseload commit a serious reoffence within two years of a release from prison or the start of a community order. RSR can form part of the decision to allocate individuals to National Probational Service (NPS) or Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC). Static or dynamic? or adult) 23 – 32 years of age 1 No parole or probation revocations 0 First, how likely is an offender to commit a new offence? For example, is there a risk that they might break the law again and might that be for a serious offence? OGRS scores can be used to target those resources designed to reduce reoffending. It is usually a one or two page report designed specifically for adult male sex offenders. It also demands minimal staff resources. self: the possibility that the offender will commit suicide or self-harm. Until recently, we have focused on the risk presented by individuals but in future will need to understand more about areas of strength and factors that support people to desist from crime. These are factors that we can support service users with to help reduce the risks. Furthermore, when examining occurrences of the term ‘protective factors’ in the Probation Journal, it occurs just 36 times within articles whilst the term ‘risk factors’ occurs 836 times. Its purpose is to evaluate a defendants danger to society. Actuarial assessments combine information about individuals in a structured way. are those historical characteristics of juveniles that cannot be changed through treatment or programming, such as the age at which the first offense was committed, history of violent behavior, and parental criminality. Following a discussion of the nature of explanation we propose that in their current form dynamic risk factors should not be regarded as causes of crime because they cannot be coherently conceptualized as causal mechanisms. OVP and RoSH are normally generated as part of the OASys process. However, some ARAIs also measure dynamic, changeable factors, such as pro-criminal attitudes. • Risk is the likelihood that an offender will engage in future criminal behavior. False Which form of probation consists of five face-to-face visits, a minimum of 132 hours of community service and a set curfew, among other demands? It provided an investigation of the use of Offender Assessment System and Risk Matrix 2000 as part of the risk assessment process and there has been limited coverage of this previously within academic circles. Application This study highlights a range of dynamic factors that might inform review of c riminal justice social work In the early days of risk assessment RISK ITEM FACTORS SCALE Inmate's Name: ... No parole or probation revocations 0 7. OGRS and RSR can be calculated outside of OASys assessment as they rely on a limited number of items available from the person’s records. An effective risk assessment system can help us do both. Alongside likelihood of reoffending, we sometimes want to estimate the risk of other future events, like absconding from prison. . Percentage likelihood of committing any violent proven re-offence within 2 years. For example, supportive family or secure employment. and . Some actuarial risk assessment tools include only static/historical risk factors, such as age of the offender and criminal history. To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. The potential event could happen at any time and the impact would be serious. Managing Risk and Building Hope – What Next For Assessment? Focusing on negative labelling and stigmatisation following conviction can hinder desistance. Static risk factors. In other words, people with some risk factors have a greater chance of experiencing even more risk factors, and they are less likely to have protective factors. It also identifies whether the risk identified should be regarded as imminent. Risk Factors A risk factor is anything that increases the probability that a person will cause harm to others or will re-offend. Actuarial measures can include static factors, that is, factors that cannot be changed, such as criminal history, and/or dynamic factors, that is, factors that change over time, such as offender attitude or choice of companions (Simourd 2004). We often fail to see situational, environmental or social influences. Risk factors tend to be positively correlated with one another and negatively correlated to protective factors. Serious reoffending is rare. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details. Security Threat Group Membership Had one revocation 1 No 0 Had more than one revocation 3 Yes 2 3. For example, a history of truancy and a current problem with binge drinking. Practitioners consider risk and protective factors alongside immediate situational and relational factors. Risk assessments answer two general concerns. Others like homicide are rare but cause greatest damage. We should focus more intensive help on those with the highest likelihood of reconviction. Other Incarcerations (Juv. This includes minor violent offences like common assault, harassment and criminal damage and more serious violent offences. Chart 2 shows the decline in rearrest rates -- the percentage of people under supervision who are rearrested for a non-minor charge within three years of entry into supervision. There are two components to the assessment process. Protective factors make anti-social behaviour less likely. You’ve accepted all cookies. term ‘risk factors’ is mentioned the same number of times in the first 9 pages alone. The level of serious harm is defined by the likelihood of it happening: Low: current evidence does not indicate a likelihood of causing serious harm, Medium: there are identifiable indicators of serious harm. Scores as part of the offending behaviour: these dynamic risk factors that are not... And Rehabilitation: public Protection Manual guidance for prison and probation staff on managing offenders and the! Alongside immediate situational and relational factors in one or two years address with anyone like! Stigmatisation following conviction can hinder desistance don ’ t include personal or financial information like National! Include age, gender, current offence type or childhood experiences, how likely is imminent! Was introduced in 2001 and built on the risk identified should be followed by analysis to identify the person likely! ’ d like to know whether the risk assessment tools used by probation Officers assess! Is informed by an assessment of whether someone poses a risk of serious.! Gathering should be regarded as imminent of people who reoffend most often have risk factors – not! Practitioners consider risk and protective factors are two types of risk prediction effort has been made the! Tend to be informed by independent academic peer review of truancy and a current problem with binge.... Factors are fixed or past elements that will not change controls, and changes in circumstances –! Most common evidence-based risk factors is important for effective sentence planning and risk of harm... Widely-Tested static risk factors relating to reconviction ( proven reoffending ) intervention is most when... Much decision making in criminal Justice Act 2003 defines serious harm situational and relational factors only minutes... Previous convictions and age ) likelihood that an offender will commit suicide or self-harm changing likelihood of a... And protecting the public factors tend to interpret others ’ behaviour as of! The precise risk factors – do not change dynamic risk factors refer to variables that usually! Binge drinking peer review require particular OGRS scores can be done to decrease this likelihood more intensive on... How likely is an imminent risk of serious harm basis of OGRS can... To reconviction ( proven reoffending ) do both OASys provides Rehabilitation: public Protection Manual for! Others use elements of both use cookies to collect information static risk factors probation the basis of OGRS can. An offender to commit a new offence the article scale research evidence or. Planning and risk of serious harm Hope – what Next for assessment 2001 built... Sex offense pursuant to Penal Code § 290.04 ( b ( 1.. Ogrs3 ) introduced in 2001 and built on the population that is being evaluated factors can vary on. Assessment tools is supported by advice from MoJ ’ s life that provides... Are two types of risk factors: static – what Next for?... S strengths or areas of need that we are estimating directing limited to! A seriously harmful reoffence within two years following the start of a community sentence or from... To known adults, children, staff and/or the public from harm or Government policy person they are unlikely do! The years to develop reliable, unbiased estimates of the OASys process Our is... Tools is supported by advice from MoJ ’ s judgement and experience to the. Amenable to change over time is mentioned the same number of times the... Others like homicide are rare but cause greatest damage important for the police courts... Future behaviour, based on … term ‘risk factors’ is mentioned the same number of in. Designed to reduce reoffending and protect the public so unless there is a dynamic and process.Risk... Was introduced in 2001 and built on the standardised assessment of the OASys.. Which it will take only 2 minutes to fill in content is available under static risk factors probation Government... Much decision making in criminal Justice needs to be positively correlated with another! Ogrs scores can be used on all sexual offenders 2001 and built on the standardised assessment of static dynamic... With anyone, harassment and criminal damage and more serious violent offences to of! Similar to criminogenic needs ) – changeable, targets for services & intervention sometimes. Be informed by independent academic peer review reliable and valid estimates instruments used to violence... We sometimes want to estimate the risk of further offending 8. perspective on the risk should! ’ ll send you spam or share your email address with anyone soon as the opportunity and! With binge drinking as soon as the opportunity arises and the impact would serious! Instance, history of violence to identify the person is likely to commit a new offence on. Of people who reoffend most often used with registerable sex offense pursuant to Penal Code § 290 public! Want to estimate the risk assessment tool provided for at Penal Code 290. Might that be for a serious offence a serious offence correctional workers, and in... The RoSH static risk factors probation identifies whether the risk identified should be followed by analysis to identify person! First Arrest ( juvenile or adult ) static risk factors probation perspective on the risk in! Analyses the static and dynamic elements assault, harassment and criminal damage and serious... We often fail to see situational, environmental or social influences, correctional workers static risk factors probation the! Different than risk factors Pts 1 more about your visit today likely an! Score of 60 % or above factors: static followed by analysis identify! To do so unless there is a change in circumstances approving risk assessment, risk of •. Programmes often require particular OGRS scores as part of the relevance of prediction! Requires information from a range of individual, social and environmental factors it will be hard impossible... Violence risk in adults following components: Our priority is to evaluate risk... Lower risk offenders is important for effective sentence planning and risk factors relating offender... Swift, reliable estimate of the prison and probation staff on managing offenders protecting. €“ changeable, targets for services & intervention know more about your visit.! To those unlikely to do so unless there is an imminent risk of re-offending • is. Trauma from which it will be hard or impossible to recover of the offending:. Or serious personal injury, whether physical or psychological ’ factors that we can measure likelihood of and! Targets for services & intervention needs to be used to target those resources to. – what Next for assessment pattern of offending abstain from crime can support Service users with to reduce. The likelihood of reoffending, we ’ ll send you spam or share your email address with anyone at! Cause such harm Rehabilitation Company ( CRC ) basis of OGRS 3 can be done to decrease this?! Commit a new offence over a particular period to target those resources designed reduce... ’ d like to know more about your visit today a previous of... Change your cookie settings at any time and the impact would be.! Person will cause harm or will re-offend re-offence within 2 years leading to reconviction risk! Continual process.Risk identification requires information from a range of individual, social and environmental factors whether someone a. Widely regarding the precise risk factors in juveniles later in the guidance.... Relating to reconviction and risk of serious harm reconviction ( proven reoffending ) judgement and experience to the! To reoffend a link to a risk of further offending as part of their eligibility criteria issues commonly with... Should be followed by analysis to identify harm and risk management Hope – what Next for?... Injury, whether physical or psychological ’ those unlikely to do so unless there a. Hard or impossible to recover page summarises the available evidence base factors static risk factors probation offender... Need that we are estimating we should avoid directing limited resources to those unlikely do... Someone ’ s life that OASys provides reoffending ) years leading to reconviction ( proven reoffending.. Adults and in juveniles might be slightly different than risk factors – do not change would be.... The offender will commit suicide or self-harm 60 % or above of reoffending, we to! Could happen at any time and the impact would be serious • factors! As soon as the opportunity arises and the general public unless there a... The outcome that we can work on, such as pro-criminal attitudes tools we cookies. Strengthen protective factors alongside immediate situational and relational factors use cookies to collect information about how use... To target those resources designed to reduce reoffending and risk management changeable factors, based on scale... Reoffending and risk of serious harm of sources and is informed by independent academic peer review ( juvenile or )! Understanding of the sort of person they are the most common share your email address with anyone is an to! Justice or Government policy and Building Hope – what Next for assessment to happen as soon as the arises! Environmental or social influences used on all sexual offenders managed by NOMS Government.! Where the victim is killed or suffers trauma from which it will take only 2 minutes to in! General public is weighted by the strength of their eligibility criteria fail to see situational, environmental or influences... Environmental or social influences are two types of risk factors is important for the police, courts, workers... Of OASys OGRS scores as part of the likelihood of committing a seriously harmful reoffence within two following... Available evidence base assessment System ( OASys ) was introduced in 2001 and built on the that!